Trump’s Latest “Peace Plan”
Another Ruse in the Web of Influence
For anyone who’s followed Trump’s actions in office related to Israel, their unconditional alignment is clear. Jared Kushner is Trump’s son-in-law, and his senior advisor on the Middle East. Kushner is an outspoken Jewish Zionist and is married to Ivanka Trump, who converted to Judaism in 2009, well before Trump’s time in office. Jared’s father, Charles Kushner—convicted of tax fraud, illegal campaign donations, and running a blackmail scheme—walked free thanks to Trump’s pardon and was rewarded with an ambassadorship to France in 2025. Coincidence?
So when Trump suddenly announced a pivot—restoring relations with Syria, lifting sanctions, praising “the great people” of Damascus—I became suspicious. It would be an amazing thing if he truly stopped backing Israel, but I don’t think we should trust it. Especially when U.S. allies like Australia seem to be preparing to follow the US into an Iranian war. They recently expelled Iran’s ambassador over flimsy vandalism charges. In this light, the Syria gesture reads as cover while the Iran play advances quietly in the background.
And now comes Gaza. The so-called “peace plan”, rolled out with Netanyahu at the White House, looks clean on paper: demilitarisation, Israeli troop withdrawal in exchange for hostages, prisoner swaps, immediate aid, and amnesty for Hamas members who agree to peace. Reasonable—until you read the fine print. Gaza would be governed by a temporary “technocratic” committee, overseen by a “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump himself, and likely flanked by establishment figures like Tony Blair. Surveillance, control, and external oversight masquerade as reconstruction.
The language of “de-radicalisation” is chilling: Israel—the occupier—casts itself as the reformer of its victims. Gaza, already pulverised, risks becoming a live testing ground for Big Brother technologies under foreign management. Of course, Netanyahu continues to run his usual play. To the West, he nods along with Trump to buy time. Meanwhile, in Hebrew, he reassures his base that Israel won’t withdraw troops and won’t allow a Palestinian state.
The U.S. record at the UN completes the picture. For years, Washington has vetoed every serious Security Council move for a ceasefire, humanitarian access, or Palestinian self-determination—even when all 14 other members backed it. Since the USA is one of five nations with standing UN-Security-Council veto privileges on every bill, they can easily block any plan; no matter the cause or overwhelming majority support, there’s no threat to their plans so long as they retain veto powers.
Each time, the veto isolates America but shields Israel from accountability. Then Trump swoops in with a counter-proposal, repackaged as a peace plan, but one that cements Israeli control under new branding. That’s the core of the ruse. Netanyahu gains time and cover, Trump gets the optics of statesmanship, and Palestinians get another layer of managed subjugation.
The “breakup” theatrics—snubbing Israel on Middle East tours, firing pro-Israel officials, humiliating Netanyahu in front of cameras—are designed for domestic consumption and international cover. But the substance doesn’t change: U.S. weapons flow, aid continues, and vetoes pile up.
So, to those who believe Trump is breaking free of Israeli influence, look closer. The Syria pivot is a distraction. The Gaza deal is a trap. The Iran campaign is still alive. The family ties, ideological overlap, legal indulgences—all remain intact.
This isn’t a peace plan... It’s a ruse.